Home / Blog / The Big Differences Between Bayesian vs. Frequentist A/B Testing

The Big Differences Between Bayesian vs. Frequentist A/B Testing

Ensley Campbell
Ensley Campbell |

A/B testing is essential for optimizing your store, but different statistical approaches handle uncertainty, sample size, and decision thresholds in very different ways. Two major schools are Frequentist and Bayesian. Understanding both helps you choose the right method and interpret results wisely.

Frequentist vs Bayesian: What Are They?

Frequentist A/B Testing

  • The Frequentist method relies solely on data from your current experiment. No prior assumptions are built in.
  • You define a null hypothesis (no difference between A and B) and an alternative hypothesis (there is a difference).
  • You split traffic randomly between version A (control) and version B (variant).
  • Wait until you have enough data so that results can reach a predetermined significance threshold (e.g., p-value < 0.05).
  • Once significance is reached, you decide whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis and implement the change or not.

Bayesian A/B Testing

  • Bayesian methods incorporate prior knowledge or beliefs (called priors) into the experiment, which get updated with the new data.
  • Instead of just giving you a yes/no result (significant or not), Bayesian testing gives you a probability distribution: for example, “there is an X% chance that B is better than A by at least Y amount.”
  • Often more flexible: you can often examine results earlier, adapt thresholds, and include uncertainty more transparently.
  • But: if the priors are poorly chosen or biased, they can distort the outcomes.

Key Differences & Comparison

  • Definition of probability: Frequentist is based on long-run frequencies; Bayesian is degree of belief or credibility.
  • Use of past data: Bayesian uses priors; Frequentist does not.
  • Output type: Frequentist often gives a point estimate + p-value; Bayesian gives posterior distributions and credible intervals.
  • Sample size requirements: Frequentist generally needs larger samples; Bayesian can perform better with smaller samples if priors are reasonable.
  • Stopping rules: Frequentist requires fixed sample size before testing; Bayesian is more flexible in when you stop.
  • Complexity and computation: Frequentist tends to be simpler in mathematics; Bayesian often requires more complex modeling or simulation.

When Each Method Makes Sense

Use Frequentist When:

  • You have high traffic and can collect large amounts of data.
  • You want clear thresholds like “is this result statistically significant or not.”
  • You prefer simpler, more standardized tools and interpretations.

Use Bayesian When:

  • You have limited traffic or small sample sizes.
  • You have prior knowledge or expectations you want to include.
  • You want more nuanced probability statements rather than binary outcomes.
  • You need flexibility in stopping tests or making decisions under uncertainty.

Sample Size & Early Results

One of the biggest practical differences is how each method behaves with small sample size:

  • Frequentist results tend to be volatile early on, and you must often wait until sample size is large enough to smooth out noise.
  • Bayesian methods, thanks to priors, can give more stable estimates early — but those priors might dominate results if the sample is too small.
  • Over long enough experiments, both methods often converge on similar outcomes when sample sizes are large.

How Tools Handle This

  • Different A/B testing tools use different approaches: some full Frequentist, others Bayesian, some hybrid.
  • Shogun’s A/B Testing uses the Chi-Squared test (a Frequentist method) behind scenes — user sees when enough data is collected to be ~95% confident. You don’t need to do heavy math. (This works well when you're measuring categories like “converted vs not converted.”) :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
  • Tools like VWO use Bayesian engines; Adobe Target or more classic tools use Frequentist methods. Understanding which your tool uses helps you interpret results properly. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

Pros & Cons Summary

  • Frequentist Advantages: Simplicity, well-understood thresholds, no need for prior assumptions.
  • Frequentist Disadvantages: Needs large sample sizes, less flexible stopping rules, binary interpretation sometimes misses nuance.
  • Bayesian Advantages: Incorporates uncertainty, works better early with priors, gives more intuitive probability statements.
  • Bayesian Disadvantages: Sensitive to priors, more complex to compute or model properly, risk of misuse if priors are misleading.

Making the Right Choice for Your Store

  • Check your tool: Know whether your A/B testing tool is Bayesian, Frequentist, or hybrid.
  • Estimate traffic & conversions: If you have low volume, Bayesian may allow faster insights.
  • Decide what kind of statement you want: Do you need “is B significantly better than A” or “what’s the probability B is better by X amount?”
  • Set stopping rules: Decide in advance when you’ll stop a test (fixed sample size, time duration, or a confidence threshold).
  • Document your priors (if using Bayesian) so your assumptions are transparent and reviewable.

Conclusion

Both Frequentist and Bayesian methods have strengths. For tools with high traffic and standard, well-understood experiments, Frequentist is a solid default. For situations with low sample sizes, or when you want more flexible outcomes and probabilistic statements, Bayesian may be preferable.

Whatever you pick, be consistent. Know how your method works, interpret results right, and align metrics to your goals. That clarity often matters more than the math.